THE WORLD SCIENCE FESTIVAL HITS THE STREETS OF NEW YORK CITY ON THE WEB
http://dervishcom.blogspot.com/2011/06/world-science-festival-hits-streets-of.html
The World Science Festival hits a streets of New York City upon Wednesday, and- this time, we do not even have to be in New York to get in upon a celebration.
For example, you’ll be means to watch a phalanx of physicists excavate in to a 96 percent of a star we can’t see, during a Thursday row contention upon “The Dark Side of a Universe.” You can attend in upon a Friday night review about a neuroscience of sleep. You can even get a practical sampling of Sunday’s scholarship travel satisfactory during Washington Square Park … all from a joy of your own desktop.
And- that’s usually a beginning: Video clips from World Science Festival presentations have been being combined to a WSFtv website, from past years as good as from this year.
World Science Festival
Theoretical physicist Brian Greene is a single of a organizers of a World Science Festival.
The legal holiday was combined in 2008 as a approach to brew art, scholarship and- fun upon a streets of New York. But this year, a event’s organizers — together with Brian Greene, a fibre idealist from Columbia University — have bigger aspirations. They wish to share a knowledge upon a Web, not usually in June, though via a year.
Greene supposing a preview for this year’s legal holiday currently during a discerning Q&A. Here’s an edited transcript:
Cosmic Log: In past years, a legal holiday has featured mind-blowing concepts such as a holographic inlet of a universe. What sorts of mind-blowers have been upon daub this year? What’s starting to unequivocally hit a hosiery off?
Brian Greene: Well, we have this module called “From Dust to …: The Radical New- Science of Longevity.” One of a participants, Aubrey de Grey, has a small flattering far-out ideas. He believes which a initial chairman who’ll live to be 1,000 years aged has already been born. That positively rankles most alternative scientists who work in a field, so it should be a unequivocally sharp-witted review about where we mount in bargain a aging process. Can we delayed it? Can we stop it? What does which mean?
I’m in a module called “The Dark Side of a Universe,” where we’ll verbalise about a 96 percent of a star which we have not seen. We’re starting to run a gamut. There’ll be experts upon dim have a difference who will be suggesting which in a nearby future, we’re expected to brand what a dim have a difference is. We’re starting to have an additional team, of which we am a member, who’ll be articulate about dim energy. We’ll be deliberating how this dim appetite was discovered, and- I’ll be pulling to a extent upon how a small of us consider which dim appetite competence be giving us a thought which there have been alternative universes out there.
There’s a smashing module that’s called “The Secret Behind a Secret of Life,” which is essentially a play. As we know, we similar to to brew art and- scholarship together in this festival. This is a fool around about a story during a back of a find of DNA. After a play, there’ll be a contention involving a small of a scientists who were concerned in a discovery. Maybe a small engaging insights which have not nonetheless been since a light of day will come out of which conversation. What unequivocally happened when DNA’s have up was discovered?
Q: A lot of people have talked about a purpose of Rosalind Franklin, who appears to have longed for out upon a credit which she was due for a discovery.
A: Rosalind Franklin is a focal indicate of this play. The fool around itself is not meant to be utterly historically accurate, though which will be a rising indicate for a review which will be focused upon a history, between a usually people alive currently who know what unequivocally happened.
Physicist Steven Weinberg is entrance to a festival. He’s we do something special which we’ve never finished prior to — which is to essentially give somebody a height to verbalise their thoughts upon their perspective of a destiny of a since subject. He’ll be vocalization about a destiny of “big science,” which is unequivocally what production has mostly incited into. What does it meant for a destiny of scholarship which appropriation for these large projects is starting to be harder and- harder to come by? Steven Weinberg is not usually a scientist. He’s not usually a Nobel Prize winner. He’s a politician of science.
Q: So what’s his resolution to a emanate of some-more costly “big science” projects, and- a hostility of governments to give over a billions of dollars which have been compulsory for such projects?
A: That’s a good question. I’m seeking brazen to discussion a answer.
Q: And- afterwards there’s a celebration of a mass of Alan Alda’s fool around about Marie Curie, “Radiance,” with Maggie Gyllenhaal in a starring purpose …
A: Yes, that’s starting to be a illusory program. we was usually during a skirt operation a couple of mins ago. Alan Alda is well known as an actor, though he’s additionally a illusory writer. This is a fool around which will unequivocally hit people’s hosiery off. Bringing art and- scholarship together is a outrageous challenge, since we wish there to be genuine science, though we do not wish to step out of a play to insist a science. So a genuine plea is, how do we confederate a epitome ideas of scholarship in a illusory format which will concede a assembly to stay in a play even as they’re guidance a science?
I consider Alan’s created to which plea and- taken a art form to a new- level, since you’re utterly drawn in by a play of Marie Curie’s life. You turn enthralled in her science, in her thoughts, a approach she looks during a universe, and- we never comprehend which you’re being brought in to these opposite ideas, since a play usually carries we off. Maggie Gyllenhaal’s illusory as Marie Curie. It’s an extraordinary cast, as well as it’s starting to be a good show.
Q: That touches upon a reason because we as well as others determined a legal holiday in a initial place. we do not consider we meant it to be a dry colloquium about systematic topics. You unequivocally longed for to rivet a public.
A: That’s usually a point. We unequivocally longed for to have new- avenues of entrance in to science, where somebody who would go to Lincoln Center though wouldn’t go to a systematic eventuality would come to a opening night and- be brought in to scholarship which way. That thought permeates usually about all we do during a festival. We have this module called “Beautiful Minds: The Enigma of Genius,” which will unequivocally try to get in to asking possibly competence is hard-wired from a get-go. Is it something which can be nurtured? What do we even meant when we use- a word “genius”? It takes so most opposite forms, in song and- art, in math as well as science. That module will proceed with a smashing montage — actors personification out 3 good geniuses in history, Ramanujan from mathematics, Marie Curie from science, and- Beethoven from music. The module will afterwards have a review between mathematicians, neuroscientists, composer Philip Glass and- alternative artists. It’s emblematic of a approach a legal holiday treats these ideas.
Let me give we a single some-more example. Pat Metheny, this mythological jazz guitarist, will be we do a module called “Music and- the Spark of Spontaneity,” in which he will be improvising onstage, we do what he does best, and- afterwards there will be a group of neuroscientists and- psychologists who will try to insist what is essentially starting upon inside his brain during those beautiful moments. Again, we have opening brought together with scholarship in sequence to allege a bargain of each.
Q: It looks as if a legal holiday is removing a small some-more similar to a TED conferences, where you’re perplexing to have a small elements accessible upon video so which they continue after a discussion is over.
A: Our idea is to be here 365 days a year. The approach we’re we do which is, we do have this WSFtv partial of a website now. We have full programs from prior years, though we additionally have smashing vignettes of programs. For 3 mins we can click in and- listen to about a large crash or black holes, or click as well as listen to about a newest bargain of aspects of neuroscience. Across a board, there’s this good scholarship programming which is drawn from any festival’s offerings, though is accessible all year turn — and- it comes in bite-size chunks or in incomparable chunks, depending upon what your ambience during a since impulse competence be.
Q: Will a small of a presentations from this year’s legal holiday be put online?
A: Yes, definitely, possibly in full or in excerpts. The idea is to have as most of a legal holiday as probable available. We typically sell out all a programs, though there have been usually so most people we can fit in a live event. Online, we can strech 10 times, 100 times, 1,000 times as most people. And- that’s a goal.
Round 01 Jun, 2011
--
Source: http://adf.ly/376361/http://www.digdod.com/the-world-science-festival-hits-the-streets-of-new-york-city-on-the-web-1032885.html
For example, you’ll be means to watch a phalanx of physicists excavate in to a 96 percent of a star we can’t see, during a Thursday row contention upon “The Dark Side of a Universe.” You can attend in upon a Friday night review about a neuroscience of sleep. You can even get a practical sampling of Sunday’s scholarship travel satisfactory during Washington Square Park … all from a joy of your own desktop.
And- that’s usually a beginning: Video clips from World Science Festival presentations have been being combined to a WSFtv website, from past years as good as from this year.World Science Festival
Theoretical physicist Brian Greene is a single of a organizers of a World Science Festival.
The legal holiday was combined in 2008 as a approach to brew art, scholarship and- fun upon a streets of New York. But this year, a event’s organizers — together with Brian Greene, a fibre idealist from Columbia University — have bigger aspirations. They wish to share a knowledge upon a Web, not usually in June, though via a year.
Greene supposing a preview for this year’s legal holiday currently during a discerning Q&A. Here’s an edited transcript:
Cosmic Log: In past years, a legal holiday has featured mind-blowing concepts such as a holographic inlet of a universe. What sorts of mind-blowers have been upon daub this year? What’s starting to unequivocally hit a hosiery off?
Brian Greene: Well, we have this module called “From Dust to …: The Radical New- Science of Longevity.” One of a participants, Aubrey de Grey, has a small flattering far-out ideas. He believes which a initial chairman who’ll live to be 1,000 years aged has already been born. That positively rankles most alternative scientists who work in a field, so it should be a unequivocally sharp-witted review about where we mount in bargain a aging process. Can we delayed it? Can we stop it? What does which mean?
I’m in a module called “The Dark Side of a Universe,” where we’ll verbalise about a 96 percent of a star which we have not seen. We’re starting to run a gamut. There’ll be experts upon dim have a difference who will be suggesting which in a nearby future, we’re expected to brand what a dim have a difference is. We’re starting to have an additional team, of which we am a member, who’ll be articulate about dim energy. We’ll be deliberating how this dim appetite was discovered, and- I’ll be pulling to a extent upon how a small of us consider which dim appetite competence be giving us a thought which there have been alternative universes out there.
There’s a smashing module that’s called “The Secret Behind a Secret of Life,” which is essentially a play. As we know, we similar to to brew art and- scholarship together in this festival. This is a fool around about a story during a back of a find of DNA. After a play, there’ll be a contention involving a small of a scientists who were concerned in a discovery. Maybe a small engaging insights which have not nonetheless been since a light of day will come out of which conversation. What unequivocally happened when DNA’s have up was discovered?
Q: A lot of people have talked about a purpose of Rosalind Franklin, who appears to have longed for out upon a credit which she was due for a discovery.
A: Rosalind Franklin is a focal indicate of this play. The fool around itself is not meant to be utterly historically accurate, though which will be a rising indicate for a review which will be focused upon a history, between a usually people alive currently who know what unequivocally happened.
Physicist Steven Weinberg is entrance to a festival. He’s we do something special which we’ve never finished prior to — which is to essentially give somebody a height to verbalise their thoughts upon their perspective of a destiny of a since subject. He’ll be vocalization about a destiny of “big science,” which is unequivocally what production has mostly incited into. What does it meant for a destiny of scholarship which appropriation for these large projects is starting to be harder and- harder to come by? Steven Weinberg is not usually a scientist. He’s not usually a Nobel Prize winner. He’s a politician of science.
Q: So what’s his resolution to a emanate of some-more costly “big science” projects, and- a hostility of governments to give over a billions of dollars which have been compulsory for such projects?
A: That’s a good question. I’m seeking brazen to discussion a answer.
Q: And- afterwards there’s a celebration of a mass of Alan Alda’s fool around about Marie Curie, “Radiance,” with Maggie Gyllenhaal in a starring purpose …
A: Yes, that’s starting to be a illusory program. we was usually during a skirt operation a couple of mins ago. Alan Alda is well known as an actor, though he’s additionally a illusory writer. This is a fool around which will unequivocally hit people’s hosiery off. Bringing art and- scholarship together is a outrageous challenge, since we wish there to be genuine science, though we do not wish to step out of a play to insist a science. So a genuine plea is, how do we confederate a epitome ideas of scholarship in a illusory format which will concede a assembly to stay in a play even as they’re guidance a science?
I consider Alan’s created to which plea and- taken a art form to a new- level, since you’re utterly drawn in by a play of Marie Curie’s life. You turn enthralled in her science, in her thoughts, a approach she looks during a universe, and- we never comprehend which you’re being brought in to these opposite ideas, since a play usually carries we off. Maggie Gyllenhaal’s illusory as Marie Curie. It’s an extraordinary cast, as well as it’s starting to be a good show.
Q: That touches upon a reason because we as well as others determined a legal holiday in a initial place. we do not consider we meant it to be a dry colloquium about systematic topics. You unequivocally longed for to rivet a public.
A: That’s usually a point. We unequivocally longed for to have new- avenues of entrance in to science, where somebody who would go to Lincoln Center though wouldn’t go to a systematic eventuality would come to a opening night and- be brought in to scholarship which way. That thought permeates usually about all we do during a festival. We have this module called “Beautiful Minds: The Enigma of Genius,” which will unequivocally try to get in to asking possibly competence is hard-wired from a get-go. Is it something which can be nurtured? What do we even meant when we use- a word “genius”? It takes so most opposite forms, in song and- art, in math as well as science. That module will proceed with a smashing montage — actors personification out 3 good geniuses in history, Ramanujan from mathematics, Marie Curie from science, and- Beethoven from music. The module will afterwards have a review between mathematicians, neuroscientists, composer Philip Glass and- alternative artists. It’s emblematic of a approach a legal holiday treats these ideas.
Let me give we a single some-more example. Pat Metheny, this mythological jazz guitarist, will be we do a module called “Music and- the Spark of Spontaneity,” in which he will be improvising onstage, we do what he does best, and- afterwards there will be a group of neuroscientists and- psychologists who will try to insist what is essentially starting upon inside his brain during those beautiful moments. Again, we have opening brought together with scholarship in sequence to allege a bargain of each.
Q: It looks as if a legal holiday is removing a small some-more similar to a TED conferences, where you’re perplexing to have a small elements accessible upon video so which they continue after a discussion is over.
A: Our idea is to be here 365 days a year. The approach we’re we do which is, we do have this WSFtv partial of a website now. We have full programs from prior years, though we additionally have smashing vignettes of programs. For 3 mins we can click in and- listen to about a large crash or black holes, or click as well as listen to about a newest bargain of aspects of neuroscience. Across a board, there’s this good scholarship programming which is drawn from any festival’s offerings, though is accessible all year turn — and- it comes in bite-size chunks or in incomparable chunks, depending upon what your ambience during a since impulse competence be.
Q: Will a small of a presentations from this year’s legal holiday be put online?
A: Yes, definitely, possibly in full or in excerpts. The idea is to have as most of a legal holiday as probable available. We typically sell out all a programs, though there have been usually so most people we can fit in a live event. Online, we can strech 10 times, 100 times, 1,000 times as most people. And- that’s a goal.
Round 01 Jun, 2011
--
Source: http://adf.ly/376361/http://www.digdod.com/the-world-science-festival-hits-the-streets-of-new-york-city-on-the-web-1032885.html
